Student Growth Measures for Teachers
The temporary changes in House Bill 197, House Bill 164 and House Bill 404 of the 133rd General Assembly impact teacher, principal and school counselor evaluations. These changes, made in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, grant districts flexibility around educator evaluations for the 2020-2021 and 2021-2022 school years.
For more information, please see Education Evaluation Systems Guide for Restart.
Student growth measures will not be required components in 2020-2021 educator evaluations in accordance with House Bill 197 and House Bill 164 of the 133rd General Assembly. A school district board of education may not use Value-Added, high-quality student data or any other student academic growth data to measure student learning attributable to a teacher or principal while conducting evaluations.
A major percentage of each teacher's evaluation comes from how much their students learn throughout the year. Student growth measures are a method for determining how much academic progress students are making by measuring growth between two points in time.
The challenge for measuring student growth is that not all teachers can use the same assessment. For the purpose of teacher and principal evaluations, there are three ways to measure student growth.
Types of Student Growth Measures
Ohio’s state tests provide value-added data, which research supports as a valid student growth measure.
- Approved Vendor Assessments
If Value-Added data is not available, districts or schools can use other assessments provided by national testing vendors and approved for use in Ohio.
- Locally Determined Measures
For subjects where traditional assessments are not an option (such as art or music) districts or schools should establish a process to create locally determined measures, including student learning objectives, to measure student progress.
Types of locally determined measures include:
Student Growth Measure Percentages
State law, Ohio House Bill 64, made adjustments to the Ohio Teacher Evaluation System for the 2015-2016 school year and beyond. Districts will choose between the original teacher evaluation framework (based on teacher performance rating and student growth rating, each at 50 percent) – and the alternative teacher evaluation framework. The alternative framework includes teacher performance at 50 percent, student growth at 35 percent and an additional measure as 15 percent of the evaluation.
The percentages for student growth measure components in both the original and alternative framework are pictured below. These diagrams are from the large graphic charts for the complete original and alternative frameworks that are posted here.
Original structure - student growth measure percentages
Alternative structure - student growth measure percentages
The electronic Teacher and Principal Evaluation System (eTPES) is the required accountability system for conducting and documenting educator evaluations and calculating ratings. Click here for more information.
Last Modified: 12/31/2020 8:04:27 AM